Defined benefit transfer compensation for those who were ill-advised to transfer out has risen for the first time in two years.
According to the DB redress tracker from actuarial consultancy OAC (part of the Broadstone Group), redress dropped from £165,000 in Q1 2022 to £50,000 in Q2 2023 before halving again to sit at about £22,000 in Q3.
However, falling gilt yields towards the end of 2023, as market expectations of Bank of England base rate cuts grew, meant that at the start of Q1 2024 an person submitting a complaint could be due around £34,000.
Even though this is an increase on Q4 2023, it still marks a notable drop in redress levels compared to two years ago.
OAC’s DB redress tracker is developed in line with Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) rules for calculating redress and follows the example of an individual who left their scheme in 2018 aged 50, with a pension of £10,000 p.a.
Brian Nimmo, head of redress solutions at OAC, said: “Our DB redress tracker seeks to illustrate the levels of compensation available to those who make a claim against the poor advice when they transferred their pension.
“Since the start of 2022 redress has fallen significantly due to the rise in annuity rates.
“This means complainants could have increasingly secured a healthy guaranteed income from their DC pot through the annuity market in place of their DB pension.”
Since Q1 2022, redress levels have dropped every quarter until now.
Following the sharp increase in annuity rates over the past 18 months, many transferors could now be projected to secure a much higher level of guaranteed income from their pot.
This will minimise the financial disadvantage for those who are seeking compensation after being wrongly advised to transfer their pension, and therefore the compensation they are due.
Nimmo said: “It now looks like compensation may have bottomed out as we appear to have reached the end of the rate hiking cycle with gilt yields and annuity rates now starting to come down.
“Redress levels are still far below their historic levels due to the changed economic situation and are worth monitoring as we progress through 2024 and beyond.”
sonia.rach@ft.com
What's your view?
Have your say in the comments section below or email us: ftadviser.newsdesk@ft.com