"I can imagine many clients would be unwilling to pay for something that might not happen and possibly losing the capital sum used to buy the longevity protection.
"If the client were concerned about longevity risks at age 65 and did not have sufficient secure income, then perhaps they shouldn’t be in drawdown or at least not over the medium to long-term."
Article continues after advert
carmen.reichman@ft.com
Page 3 of 3
