Long Read  

What are the differences between national partnerships and networks?

What are the differences between national partnerships and networks?
Financial adviser networks and national partnerships have many similarities, but some important differences (iLixe48)

Some of the UK’s most successful advice businesses are set up as either national partnerships or networks, but to an outsider it can be hard to tell the difference between the two structures.

Both self-employed registered individuals within a national partnership and advisers within a network can access the services and support provided by the parent company, including marketing support, paraplanning, compliance and administration.

Both also still have the autonomy to make their own plans, decisions and to determine their own direction of travel in growing their business.

Article continues after advert

However, there are also many core differences between the two models.

National advisory businesses typically offer a common consistent client charging structure throughout the business. Businesses within network models on the other hand are typically free to create and operate their own client fee model as long as it sits within the parameters of a network's pre-set limits.

Unlike a network, a national partnership asks advice businesses to operate as one brand and identity, with the advisers working as part of the same business and representing the traits desired by the company as a whole.

This builds consistency within the business and consistent client delivery across the country as everyone operates in a uniform manner. 

Under a network structure, each business acts independently and can develop its own brand identity. This does mean differences between network members' service costs and delivery across the country.

When clients deal with a member business of a network they are dealing with just that member, whereas where clients deal with a member business of a national partnership they are effectively dealing with the whole partnership and not just the adviser in front of them, as there is a connected community within the partnership.

This is why some businesses choose a national partnership model rather than as a network; under a network structure, some businesses may feel they would struggle to generate an ethos of collaboration and identity.

Making the right choice

Therefore, as an adviser looking to start up on your own, when considering if you would rather join a network or a national partnership, you need to ask yourself if you want to be part of a fully supported collective or are you just looking for some support. 

There are also differences between the way networks and national partnerships typically address centralised investment propositions.

CIPs are unique to each individual partnership business, mainly because many nationals will produce a different target market assessment.

In networks, which effectively offer a support service, generally speaking they will provide a prescriptive model for their restricted advisers, and usually offer a framework for their independent financial adviser community.

Each IFA business within a network will typically be responsible for assessing and determining client needs and wants specific to their own client base, effectively creating their own CIP within the framework offered. The network will then have the responsibility to sign off and provide continuous oversight for each individual CIP.